« Your Rights | Home | To the Ron Paul Meet Ups : Time to set priorities »
Your help is needed to push RP to call for a RECOUNT of this obviously rigged primary
By zoi | January 10, 2008
SCREEN CAPTURE FROM BOSTON GLOBE WEBSITE SHOWING REAL TIME AP PRECINCT TALLIES TELLS THE REAL STORY: WE & RP GOT ROBBED!!! LHS Rigged this election via Diebold machines exactly the way Bev Harris of Black Box Voting Predicted.
LOOK AT THIS: http://www.youtube.com/v/qV6qAGigGYY&rel=1&border=1“> Several of us have backed this up in case anyone tries to remove it from cyberspace, but it proves election fraud has just occured in NH on a massive scale. This is a screen capture made from the Boston Globe (newspaper) website showing Associated Press real time precinct vote totals before they got rigged by LHS associates which counted 81% of the NH vote via their rigged Diebold machines.
Also see this:
Hand Count Shows 15% For Ron Paul
By zooamerica | January 9, 2008
This would have placed Dr. Paul in 3rd place, just as the polls were showing before the primary…
http://www.dailypaul.com/node/23643
The computer counted votes are the problem.
Not a single hand count township showed less than 10%
Supposedly, Ron Paul got 8% - this does not make sense.
richmond is hand count 34% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
lyman is hand count 28.7% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
Orange is hand count 25% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
Harts location is hand count 25% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
wentworth is hand count 24% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
goshen is hand count 17.68% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
marlow is hand count 16.6% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
cornish is hand count 14.8% for dr. Paul…100% reporting
Rumney is hand count 14.5% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
croydon is hand count 14 % for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
dorchester is hand count 13.89% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
effingham is hand count 13% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
albany is hand count 12.9% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
antrim is hand count 12% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
south hampton is hand count 12% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
sullivan is hand count 12.61% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
troy is hand count 12.21% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
mason is hand count 11.88% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
newport is hand count 11.45% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
charlstown is hand count 11.3% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
Allenstown is hand count 11.16% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
bristol is hand count 11% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
warren is hand count 11% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
Strafford is hand count 11% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
washington is hand count 11.02% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
lancaster is hand count 10.9% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
springfield is hand count 10.6% for Dr.Paul…100% reporting
wilton is hand count 10.37% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
Northfield is hand count 10.3% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
mont vernon is hand count 10.25% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
Join me in demanding a manual recount by doing the following:
1. Contact electionlaw@doj.nh.gov
2. Contact Ron Paul’s campaign via this form on their website: http://www.ronpaul2008.com/contact/form
Topics: Breaking News, New Hampshire |
17 Responses to “Your help is needed to push RP to call for a RECOUNT of this obviously rigged primary”
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
January 10th, 2008 at 6:54 am
As soon as you find this type of video record it because they are being removed or something as this one is no longer available.
January 10th, 2008 at 7:02 am
It’s time to escalate the Infowar and let these criminals at LHS Associates know we are watching and clearly aware of what they are doing. Here is the contact information for that company -
website - http://www.lhsassociates.com/index.html
email - jeffs@lhsassociates.com
Please take the time to email this company with your “polite” comments (if you can possibly refrain your outrage) about the obvious fraud going on in the primary elections so far. They MUST know we are aware of this situation!
January 10th, 2008 at 7:10 am
As far as the youtube video regarding boston.com, that looks like it was just a typographical error. Apparently the columns are shifted by one.
However, if it’s true that all of the hand-counted precincts are reflecting higher percentages than the computer tabulated precincts, I believe that is solid grounds for requesting a recount.
January 10th, 2008 at 7:21 am
Actually no Jake, its not just the column headings, the vote tallies in the whole spreadsheet are incorrect, not to mention the total NH vote tally for Ron Paul has changed by more than 400 votes from the old version to the new one.
January 10th, 2008 at 7:21 am
I would like to know what is taking Ron Paul so long to respond to his supporter?
January 10th, 2008 at 7:24 am
Please feel free to use or edit this email text that I just send to the state of New Hampshire’s election commission -
To: electionlaw@doj.nh.gov
Election officials -
As a concerned citizen of the United States of America, I am joining the demand for a legitimate HAND recount of the primary election ballots for the state of New Hampshire. It was my understanding your state was famous for being a fair place to vote and one that allowed the people to choose their candidates without fear of manipulation or fraud.
Unfortunately, there is quickly growing evidence of vote fraud in your state and this is completely unacceptable! I understand the importance of this situation and I expect you to do whatever is necessary to correct this problem.
I demand a HAND recount of the primary election ballots as soon as possible!
(Your name here)
(Your city & state here)
January 10th, 2008 at 7:34 am
The only problem with this video is if you look at Tancredo’s column it is WAY too high to be accurate and the McCain column is WAY too low. I am not sure what happened, perhaps a column shift. I am not saying that there wasn’t fraud but I dont’ think this is a smoking gun.
January 10th, 2008 at 7:36 am
I think as AJ, it sounds like a mistake, now this website says it has a mistake in columns other day
January 10th, 2008 at 8:12 am
Thanks for the info. I have just written for a recount.
Hope this helps. I fear we are in real trouble if we just let this little ‘typo’ go by. Whatever it is, it needs to be dealt with.
January 10th, 2008 at 8:49 am
A YouTube video from Black Box Voting that you won’t soon forget:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PiiaBqwqkXs
THE CAT THAT CONTROLS NEW HAMPSHIRE ELECTION PROGRAMMING
John Silvestro and his small private business, LHS Associates, has
exclusive programming contracts for ALL New Hampshire voting machines,
which combined will count about 81 percent of the vote in the primary. And
as to Super Tuesday and beyond: Silvestro also has the programming
contracts for the states of Connecticut, Massachusetts, and Vermont.
Silvestro IS the New Hampshire chain of custody in New England — Or at
least, a very large component in it.
Last fall, with the help of citizens like you, Black Box Voting began
working on “Chain of Custody” projects, in which we identified some of
the areas of concern that might affect many jurisdictions at once. First
on the list for the Northeast U.S. is LHS Associates, a vendor with
inside access to every memory card, as well as to the chips containing
the “brain” of the Diebold optical scan machines.
RARE VIDEO FOOTAGE
In an unusual confluence of available video, we obtained footage of
Silvestro grappling with Harri Hursti, the master hacker who had his way
with the Diebold optical scans in Leon County, Florida in the famous
exploit that was showcased in the film Hacking Democracy.
The exact same make, model and version hacked in the Black Box Voting
project in Leon County is used throughout New Hampshire, where about 45
percent of elections administrators hand count paper ballots at the
polling place, with the remaining locations all using the Diebold version
1.94w optical scan machine. Because the voting machine locations tend
to be urban, this represents about 81 percent of the New Hampshire
voters.
The video shows Harri Hursti testifying on Sept. 19 before the New
Hampshire legislature, attempting to explain significant vulnerabilities
requiring urgent mitigations; throughout his testimony, Silvestro
inserted his own comments, opinions, misstatements and speculations.
VOTING MACHINE CHECKUP
One area of disagreement between Hursti and Silvestro was the amount of
expertise needed to exploit the Diebold 1.94w optical scan system.
Silvestro claimed (in a strange contortion of reasoning) that he doesn’t
hire very skilled programmers, implying that this makes New Hampshire
elections more secure.
Hursti pointed out that hiring programmers with a lack of knowledge is
generally not considered a security feature, and also that an average
high schooler can learn to exploit the system in two days to two weeks.
WE THINK IT DOESN’T TAKE THAT LONG
Black Box Voting purchased a Diebold optical scan with 1.94w firmware,
and chose a computer repair shop out of the phone book, took it in,
grabbed the first available technician. It took him less than 10 minutes
to zero in on the memory card as a point of critical vulnerability –
and oh my, did he point out some other intersting things!
NEW HAMPSHIRE HASN’T UPGRADED SYSTEM SECURITY
Silvestro tries to claim that the security problems have been fixed in
newer editions. Whether or not they have been, it’s a moot point in New
Hampshire where the upgrade is not made unless the Ballot Law
Commission meets, and they have not met for ages.
Silvestro then points to extraordinary measures taken by other states
to enact special procedural safeguards, but of course none of those were
implemented in New Hampshire either, because the Ballot Law Commission
has not bothered to meet since March 2006.
IN FACT, NEW HAMPSHIRE HAS NOT IMPLEMENTED MITIGATIONS FOR KNOWN RISKS
Not only that, they have turned all the programming over to a sole
source private company, taking vote counting for 81 percent of New
Hampshire citizens out of the public domain.
LHS is not subject to public records requirements, as the government
is, at least, not in New Hampshire. The control over memory card contents
is absolute; when cards malfunction or get lost, LHS brings the
replacements.
CONTROL OVER THE “BRAINS” OF THE MACHINE: ACCESS TO THE CHIP
Since LHS maintains the machines, repairs the machines, and replaces
the machines — often on Election Day — when they malfunction, they have
intimate access to the chips, sockets, ports, communications devices
and other electronic components.
Silvestro stated that the chip has “read only memory” and cannot be
reprogrammed without frying it under ultraviolet light overnight.
Hursti never had a chance to examine the hardware, nor have most of the
recent university studies had access. But our friendly neighborhood
computer repair guy differed with Silvestro on the point of plug & play
reprogramming of the guts of the machine.
After I push the button to send this message out to the media and the
citizenry, I’ll work on getting a short YouTube video of the Accuvote
checkup by our local computer repairman. And before you say, “But wait!
He’s not a world class expert!” — That’s just the point.
Our local computer repairman may hit or miss on some of his analyses.
You’ll all be able to try your hand at second guessing him as soon as
the next video is up. But if he hits even one of his ideas for how to
exploit the machine to steal votes, that’s all it takes. From someone who
is not, certainly, a world class hacker or even a hacker at all.
I’ll post the link to that in a follow up here:
http://www.bbvforums.org/forum.....1199744175 ,
and invite you techs to weigh in.
The We the People Foundation has filed this lawsuit in all 50 states to push for verifiable paper ballots in all elections http://www.wethepeoplefoundati…..-11-06.htm They deserve everyone’s support. We must immediately challenge this rigged Primary and demand a recount. If Ron Paul’s campaign staff doesn’t do it, as far as I’m concerned that would be indicative of plants on the staff.
How could that be? Melinda Pillsbury has exposed the Cato Institute, a Libertarian Think Tank in Washington DC as being controlled by the Neocons- see her excellent article “The Enemy Within- Cato’s Covert Agenda” at http://www.nolanchart.com/author18.html
Jim Condit of http://www.votefraud.org had poll watchers in at least some of the precincts. I talked with him yesterday, and will be in touch with him about anything they might have found out. If there were any discrepancies in those precincts that used paper ballots, he would have found them out. Also, if the result from the precincts counted via paper ballots differed noticably from those where the vote was counted by LHS associates using hackable Diebold Machines, that would also raise a red flag. Stay tuned folks, and while this gets sorted lets keep pushing full tilt for Dr. Paul. We have no choice at this point, he either gets elected, or we get the iron boot of tyranny stomping in our faces forever.
WHAT TO DO: Call Ron Paul’s campaign office at 703-248-9115 and demand that they officially demand a RECOUNT!! The Supreme Court has ruled that a constitutional election entails two things 1) That we have the right to cast a vote, and 2) We have the right to have that vote COUNTED accurately!
It is very evident from the information cited in this message that LHS Associates just rigged the New Hampshire primary. Every American who has contributed to the Ron Paul campaign has just been ROBBED along with the registered voters of New Hampshire including those in Sutton whose votes were not counted! Email this whole alert to Ron Paul via this contact form on their website http://www.ronpaul2008.com/contact/form
January 10th, 2008 at 9:42 am
There are 126 hand-counted precincts. The list above “proving” Ron Paul got 15% only shows the precincts where Ron did extremely well.
This is only partial information and it’s causing us to react against the NH GOP (who has always treated us fairly), yell at the media (like that makes us look educated), and fight against our own campaign. And the whole time, we’re the ones who are wrong because we are only looking at a very small piece of the picture.
STOP BEING SHEEPLE! And do some research for yourselves. My GOD!
For a list of all the numbers from hand-counted precincts, go to http://www.freedomsphoenix.com.....?At=028746
January 10th, 2008 at 3:52 pm
on Paul has so many field workers. Why not set up a Ron Paul booth at all election sites where RP voters can leave their name and id number after they casted their vote. Although not conclusive this can be a barometer to measure against the declared figures. You should then be less in the dark about the size of the fraud committed against you and if action should be taken. Recounts will not be effective because criminals usually get rid of evidence as soon as possible after committing the crime. A recount will only reflect a nominal deviation completely discrediting you if you want recounts in future. Remember that you good people are dealing with hardened professional criminals. Recounts will make you all look like fools. Start taking your own records at voting stations. I am sure your supporters are passionate enough to comply. Even if you get no where with your complaints you will at least have a much better idea of your support base if a REAL revolution breaks out.
May 12th, 2008 at 11:21 pm
tdqheukg gwtuc peuoxdr uajnw hvcgryk zcbqvd ingrzehaj
May 12th, 2008 at 11:22 pm
xlze rqwfil rqsu nhstl gzyrnhfpa xhysa yvizx http://www.iklcd.cziq.com
May 13th, 2008 at 6:33 am
nxzjs ronk avzoxpj
http://www.youtube.com/XenicalOnline canada xenical
May 13th, 2008 at 6:34 am
jupkqga mukjr
http://www.dafont.com/profile.php?user=162984 exelon invitational
May 13th, 2008 at 6:34 am
hkpozid hiapqk ashpi zlxj
http://exelon.weebly.com exelon drug